It is easy to be a yogi in a cave in the Himalayas. Ascetics don’t realize how good they have it. They don’t have to worry about how to make the next college payment or tolerate telemarketers at dinner. No one cuts them off in traffic or expects them to put their world on hold for the Super Bowl.

I think it is especially difficult to be both a mother and a yogi. It’s the whole detachment thing. Mothers who tie themselves to other humans with that most intimate of tethers, the umbilical cord, can’t just cut loose the people, concerns, and joys in their lives. It’s a snap to detach in the bowels of a mountain. But just try it when your ailing nineteen-year-old calls from some under-staffed, low-tech hospital in a Third World country thousands of miles away. Or when your other daughter, the cheerful one, is crying her heart out, right there on your shoulder, over some loser who didn’t call.

To the yogi, even-mindedness is everything. We search for balance in mind, body, and spirit. We flow through poses meant to make us strong and centered—and presumably able to handle with equanimity the day the washer overflows and the cat barfs in front of guests and the sturdy oak shading your car falls like a giant flyswatter.

I meditate and practice asanas and read yogic texts—and I still fall apart in the midst of calamity. I still burn with anger and sink into depression. It is quite obvious. I am an inept yogi.

I don’t look like a yogi. I have the kind of shape that runs screaming from a unitard. I have fat cells as old as my children.

I don’t eat like a yogi either. Although I avoid most red meat, I still have occasional moments when bliss comes as a burger and fries. Vegetables are still my enemy, and vegetarianism is just an excuse to eat bread. Some days I wonder why I even unroll the yoga mat.

And then something unusual will happen and I will discover a tiny corner of yogi in me. Maybe I’ll be packed in a shop with all the other Christmas shoppers, clutching a paper in my hand, and waiting for the clerk to call my number. The woman next to me is transferring a fractious baby from one hip to another. I notice her number is higher than mine. And before I even realize what I’m doing, I offer to trade numbers. She declines, but I see the hope in her eyes and insist. And as the trade is made, the moment our fingers touch, a wave of calm and patience swamps me.

And then there was the time my cat was feeling poorly and I rushed her to the vet, only brief hours before I was due to drive halfway across the country. I thought the vet would simply give me some pills, the administration of which I could pawn off on the pet-sitter. But the vet said, no, my cat was dying from the advanced stages of renal failure. I had a choice: let her suffer or put her under.

I have had to put pets to sleep before. But this time, yogi mind reared its head and I was filled with ethical issues. Grief and sorrow mixed with the confusion of karma. Ahimsa is the yogic concept of:  harm no being or creature. My rational husband assured me it was the right thing to do. (I’d even consulted with him on the cell phone before holding Eclipse the cat for the last time, and he’d said: do it; make it merciful.) Yet I still cry for Eclipse sometimes.

Now, as a yogi, I don’t assume every good snake is a dead snake. When a spider invites itself into my shower, I don’t automatically reach for a shoe. I call for my husband to capture the creature and release it outside. Although it is a challenge, I try to refrain from glaring at impatient and rude people who shout in cell phones in public places.

As I said, being a yogi isn’t easy, especially in the wireless age, but then maybe it isn’t supposed to be.

 

In August 1999, I put my daughter on a plane for Ecuador and settled down to wait. I had heard all the public relations about study abroad: how my daughter would never be the same after a semester as a foreigner. But I liked her the way she was before she left, I tell my husband, with a sniffle. He takes the exit out of the airport and gives my leg a comforting pat.

Gallivanting all over the world (otherwise known as “broadening”) is almost a requirement in raising a child in today’s global society. Corporate recruiters look for candidates who are sensitive to other cultures and savvy about political issues. Bilingual and multilingual skills translate into bonuses. Recognizing the value of the study abroad experience, however, doesn’t make it go down any easier for those left behind—parents, siblings, grandparents, roommates, lovers, pets.

So What Do We Do as We Wait?

My routine—one followed even on Sundays and holidays—quickly evolved. Each morning I checked the weather page in the newspaper to find out how the weather was in my daughter’s corner of the world. In Quito, Ecuador, situated within kissing distance of the equator, temperatures averaged in the sixties and seventies from August through December—the rainy season. It sounded like paradise with an umbrella, but I wasn’t to be fooled. No matter how perfect the weather where your child resides, you wonder what clothes and accessories he or she has on hand to reply to the elements: rain gear, hat, sun block, mosquito netting.

After the weather check, I turned to the international pages for catastrophic news: floods, blizzards, hurricanes, rebellions, political coups, or tribal uprisings. Of course, something or someone will be on the rampage near your child—you just know it. In my case, it was volcanoes. In Ecuador, a country smaller than Nevada, there are thirty volcanoes in two mountain ranges. The area is affectionately called the Avenue of the Volcanoes. Although most of Ecuador’s volcanoes are extinct, two bad boys flexed their muscles while my daughter was there: Tungurahua, which caused the evacuation of whole villages and the abandonment of businesses and crops, and Guagua Pichincha, which belched plumes of ash into the sky and sent everyone near Quito hunting for protective masks.

After breakfast, and my digestion of the news, I headed downstairs to gather my e-mail. On a good day, a message from Ecuador was waiting. To accomplish this feat, my daughter had ridden on a bus for two hours to a nearby major city, eluded the pickpockets, and found a cybercafe with a working Internet connection. Often the e-mails were short and reassuring: “The Quito airport has been closed for six days due to the volcano. Don’t worry. So far the ash showers are not bothering my asthma. I doubt the volcano will have an impact on my case of food poisoning.”

Occasionally the waiting was interrupted by a letter, written a month ago, perhaps amid a cloud of butterflies in the rain forest or huddled wet to the bone on a dirt floor. These communiqués expressed weeks-old feelings, fears, joys, and frustrations. You don’t know whether to be relieved or to call the American consul. Even better than a letter was a telephone call. At first, you can’t believe that the voice so far away is your baby and you feel like weeping, but at $2 a minute, you contain yourself. These calls are invariably bittersweet; your child is alternately enchanted by new experiences and yearning for familiar ones. Homesickness crackles between the words and the inevitable pauses of international telecommunications. Excitement sings along the wires.

These calls are never long enough and often inadequate—especially when your child opens by announcing that she is calling from the hospital but you’re not to worry.

“The hospital staff thinks the dysentery is under control,” my daughter says, and I imagine my firstborn alone in a strange hospital ward at the mercy of Third World medicine men and women.

“Is the hospital clean?” I ask.

“It looks okay to me,” she says. This from the daughter who hasn’t felt a hot shower in eight weeks.

“Can you understand the doctors and nurses?”

“Sometimes.”

What Took You So Long

We wait for soldiers to return from war and for the butcher to call our number at the meat counter. Teachers wait for understanding to flicker and shine in the eyes of students. Mothers wait for babies to be born. Children wait for St. Nick to squeeze down a chimney and step over the gas logs.

Does anyone become good at waiting? I am told that waiting teaches patience and humility, but then it also inspires road rage.

I’ve come to understand that you endure waiting by simply doing it and not thinking for too long at any one time about that for which you wait—that child who is dodging malaria-carrying mosquitoes in the rain forest or drinking espressos in a Parisienne café or cajoling a camel across the desert. That child, who you remember as being incapable of picking up her own socks, is now doing everything without you, and she is managing quite well, making mistakes and discovering strengths. In fact, she is laundering her Gap shirts by slapping them on a rock—something you can’t imagine doing.

Waiting is about letting go a little bit at a time, e-mail by e-mail, letter by letter. We can go into withdrawal and take to our beds or we can discover some strengths of our own. And when the plane touches down and she walks into your arms, you can’t help but notice that there’s a confidence to her stride, a gutsiness that she wears like an expensive perfume. Suddenly, you are in awe of what she has become—the woman you always wanted her to be.

Thoughts? When have you had to let go? How did you handle it?

 

My daughter hates birds. Except for Tippi Hedren after being cooped up for months on a shoot with spooky Alfred Hitchcock, I don’t understand someone taking such a dislike to birds. “It’s their knees,” she says. “They bend backwards. Gross.”

 

I, on the other hand, am intrigued by any creature that effortlessly runs, swims, or flies. It seems you never see a gazelle with arthritic knees or a klutzy sunfish or an eagle with a fear of heights. Gracefulness, that ability to move seamlessly through one’s environment, simply amazes me.

 

Oh, I’ll admit nature can be a pain. For weeks I entertained murderous thoughts about a woodpecker that enjoyed early morning jackhammering on the wall by my bed. A friend suggested that I place fake snakes on the side of the house to scare off the woodpecker, a trick similar to mounting phony owls on the runways of airports. But I didn’t think nailing rubber reptiles to the wood siding was going to enhance my property value.

 

And I have been known, while camping, to shout for a gun in the middle of the night as I tossed and turned in my sleeping bag, finding every rock on the ground, while a whippoorwill in a nearby tree called and called and called.

 

Yet despite these nuisances, I keep seeking nature out. Since moving from North Carolina to Minnesota, I have taken to the trails that crisscross the prairie. I never tire of seeing the white egret standing on the edge of the pond. And if the Canada geese are noisy so are the airplanes.

 

One of my first weekend trips after I arrived was to the Mississippi River where on an island there was a colony of great blue heron or as we birding insiders call them: GBHs. GBHs are cool creatures, winging overhead their long legs dangling behind them, but they are something else playing house in gargantuan nests atop the cottonwoods. A naturalist told me that every year they count the GBHs in Minnesota. It is not a job for the timid. The census takers wear goggles and rain gear because apparently the GBHs do not take kindly to being counted and express their displeasure by either pecking or vomiting on the GBH counter.

 

My husband, who was raised in Minnesota, has childhood memories of loons on crystal lakes. Even though we live in suburbia, he has two pairs of binoculars at the ready at all times. This is not as crazy as it sounds. When visiting Connemara, the North Carolina mountain home of Carl Sandburg, I noticed a pair of binoculars on the dining room table. There was a line of bird feeders outside the dining room windows. Apparently, it was not unusual for Carl to throw down his grilled cheese in the middle of lunch, grab the spyglasses, and scope out the hummingbirds.

 

Of course, it does not do to become too attached to anything in nature. Easy come, easy go is the natural law. Once I was watching a little boy tossing stale bread to some ducks in a small lake in North Carolina. It was spring, and the cuddly, fuzzy baby ducks simply melted your heart. We were laughing at the ducks’ antics when a big turtle rose out of the water and snapped off the head of one of the baby ducks. The traumatized child ran screaming to his mother. Suddenly, I wanted my mother, too.

 

After reading any news on the Timberwolves (the basketball team, not the critters) and the latest terrorist attacks, I usually turn to the Variety section of the paper. There in the “Did You Know?” column is all kinds of useful information. Sometimes even stuff about birds. One morning after reading the paper, I had to call my daughter. I’d just read that those knobs on the long, pencil-thin legs of flamingos were not knees. They were ankles. The knees of flamingos are actually hidden under their feathers.

 

“So, what you’re saying is this bird has ankles half way up its legs,” my daughter said. “That’s still gross.”

 

 

I had been stumbling around in the plot of a book I was writing for some time. I knew the protagonist couldn’t read and that books were disappearing. I was going for some kind of Alice Hoffman magical realism thing. Perhaps with a little humor since my book’s working title was “Too Dark to Read,” after the Groucho Marx quote: “Outside a dog, a book is man’s best friend. Inside a dog, it’s too dark to read.” But then in 1996, my daughter came through the door, crying, “Mom, they’re banning books!”

My daughter was a junior and an IB student in a North Carolina high school. She had a mean forehand and a voracious love for books, including the book in question, The Old Gringo by Carlos Fuentes. Fuentes is recognized as one of the most influential writers in Latin America. In fact, in 2006, he received the Four Freedoms Award for Freedom of Speech and Expression. Ironic, I know.

My first response was to sit down, read the book, and discuss it with my daughter. It is the story of celebrated American writer and journalist Ambrose Bierce, who mysteriously disapeared in Mexico during its civil war. Fuentes imagines the fate of Bierce among Pancho Villa’s troops in a tale that examines “the borders between men and women, dreams and reality, Mexico and the U.S,” as Publishers Weekly put it.

What the censors in our town (parents of one of the students) objected to were explicit scenes between a young Mexican revolutionary and the American teacher, who falls in love with him. I had no problem with my 17-year-old daughter reading those scenes. But then I’ve never denied my daughter a book she wanted to read.

After an intense public meeting and a review by committee, The Old Gringo eventually was returned to the shelf and the IB curriculum. But in the process, my daughter’s English teacher, a favorite of many of the kids, decided to move on, perhaps to a place where teachers didn’t receive hate mail.

This incident had a huge impact on the direction of my book. Book banning in fictitious Mercy, North Carolina, became the conflict, and Antigone Brown, the woman who fights the censors, ponders the same questions I had as I wrote letters in protest of the removal of The Old Gringo.

All too often, censorship is a parental issue. As Antigone says in Book of Mercy, “I want to protect my child from the world. But I also want to protect the world for my child.”

What I learned in writing this book and in raising my daughter is that books can never be allowed to disappear from the shelves without a squeak. We must say something; explode the discussion in letters, e-mails, tweets, and public meetings. We must never let censorship dissolve into the dark.

According to the American Library Association, on average about five hundred books are challenged every year in the United States—and those are just the ones we know about. Some would say this is horrible. But I think if we didn’t have a way to challenge the actions of others, we wouldn’t be truly free.

So I accept that book challenges are necessary, but I also am happy when they fail.

Book of Mercy, a story about a woman who faces her greatest fear to save a town’s books, is available in paperback and on Kindle. Read more about Book of Mercy or check out an excerpt.

 

It is a dark day when a national newspaper like the Wall Street Journal advocates censorship for the good of the kids. In a June 4, 2011 article, WSJ complained about the “darkness” in young adult (YA) fiction these days. It noted that far too often young readers find themselves ”surrounded by images not of joy or beauty but of damage, brutality and losses of the most horrendous kinds.”

It notes parents should be allowed to guide what young people read—no argument there as long as said parents keep their hands off MY children’s reading list. But WSJ goes on: ”In the book trade, this is known as ‘banning’. In the parenting trade, however, we call this ‘judgment’ or ‘taste’.”

Linda Holmes, a blogger for NPR, brings up an excellent point when she wonders who parents are trying to protect by imposing their “guidance” on someone else. She writes:

“Banning is banning, not guidance, and if the suggestion is that that’s the parenting role, it has to be done … regretfully, I think. Even for parents acting with regard to their own kids, the act of one human being actually preventing another human being from reading a book is a grave decision. Obviously, not everything is appropriate for every audience — nobody is suggesting you give Twilight to your seven-year-old. (Or, really, to anyone, although that’s more because of the quality of the writing than because the themes are too dark.) But stopping — actually stopping — a YA reader from picking up a particular book because it describes behavior you don’t want him to emulate potentially cuts him off from something that might reach him in exchange for … nothing, really, except your own comfort level.”

Will children emulate the behaviors they read about—suicide, cursing, having sex, self-mutilation, bullying, being abusive, rape? Who knows? I have to believe that one scene of a girl cutting herself or a boy beating up another one for his lunch money will not undo the years of parenting I have invested in raising loving and caring individuals with healthy self-esteems.

No one reads books in a vacuum. We bring to each book our own values and beliefs, and we slide the book’s values into our own to see how they fit. We reject what doesn’t fit and enjoy what does.

I read YA fiction. I love its energy, creativity, and moral system. I read the Harry Potter books and don’t see the evils of magic. I see children learning about courage and unbreakable friendships, about being different and surviving. I read Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games series and see brutality unmasked and manipulation thwarted. These are the values I want my children to think about and, perhaps, adopt.

U.S. General William Westmoreland said, “Without censorship, things can get terribly confused in the public mind.”  I would argue just the opposite. With censorship, things can get terribly muddled in the mind of a child.

Kids already know that ugliness exists in the world. Through books, they discover it’s how you handle the ugliness that counts.

 

In a way, I feel sorry for Kate Middleton. There is so much you don’t experience when you are planning a royal wedding. Since I have been planning the wedding of a commoner (in status, not spirit), I can speak to the joys of the true DIY wedding. Here’s what you missed, Kate:

  • Flood watch. For suspense, there is nothing like watching in despair as the Mississippi River creeps up the steps, crosses the patio, and pounds against the doors of the wedding venue: Harriet Island Pavilion. I was glued for much of April to the flood forecast charts provided by the National Weather Service and the St. Paul river cam images of a raging Big Muddy. Guests asked if they should bring galoshes and hair dryers. The facility manager suggested we have a Plan B. Finally, the waters crested at more than 19 feet. (Harriet Island becomes submerged at 17.5 feet.) By the day of the wedding, however, the river was back to its normal lazy self.
  • Getting to know the folks at Paper Depot intimately. My daughter wanted to make all the invitations, programs, menus, and name cards. I designed, the bride-to-be Sarah selected the paper, and together with her sister Suzanne we spent a snowy afternoon at Paper Depot planning. I dare say I had more fun than a royal flunky running the die cut machine for 130 invitations (although it did inspire my old tennis elbow injury to flare up). Do you think the Queen Mum would have jettisoned her useless handbag, tossed her pastel boater to the wind, and rolled up her elegant sleeves at a family pizza and wine party to assemble invitations? Not bloody likely.
  • The incomparable dress. When it came to dresses, the princess chose the famous British fashion house Alexander McQueen, while my daughter went with Goodwill. She found the dress of her dreams at the once-a-year sale of donated new and slightly worn gowns. Her look was as elegant as the royal bride’s, though. Like something out of Grace Kelly’s closet. If Holly Golightly had gotten married at the end of “Breakfast at Tiffany’s” instead of saving a half-drowned cat, this is what she would have worn.
  • The flowers. To the horror of my gardening sensibilities, my daughter decided real flowers were too “stressful.” So she went another route that can only be described as the Dr. Seuss detour. Fashioning flowers out of colored paper (hello, Paper Depot, again), her bouquets, boutonnieres, and table center pieces were blooms cut from a whimsical garden—and, in the end, I found myself falling in love with them. Oh, the places you’ll go when you decide not to grow.

Yes, weddings are serious things, but they also should be fantastical, Kate. They should have wedding programs with Mad Libs and crossword puzzles in them to keep your guests occupied while all those pictures are being taken. They should be high on romance and low on stuffiness. And when your wedding day winds down and you head home—whether to a palace with 775 rooms or a 100-year-old brick fixer upper in St. Paul—remember the words of  Theodor “Dr. Seuss” Geisel as you snuggle among the covers: “You know you’re in love when you can’t fall asleep because reality is finally better than your dreams.”

© 2011 Sherry Roberts Notebook Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha